Please Guys if you are replying to this thread, make sure your HTML setting are OFFFFFFFFF because as I have already explained in another thread today, replies to a posting that have appeared on Prodig in HTML will often 'trigger' your email to an HTML setting, with the result that we have a flurry of these posts on the list.

What follows represents but a SMALL part of a SMALL posting sent in HTML as it appears to those who receive the Prodig Digest version! Now you can see for yourselves the overriding reason why the guidelines specify NO HTML!

Lets give the Digest guys a break please.

Thanks

Richard



> - ------=_NextPart_000_003A_01C3DDD8.4C53F170
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> <html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" =
> xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" =
> xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
> xmlns:st1=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" =
> xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40";>
>
> <head>
> <meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
> charset=3Diso-8859-1">
> <meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
> <o:SmartTagType =
> namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
> name=3D"PersonName"/>
> <!--[if !mso]>
> <style>
> st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }
> </style>
> <![endif]-->
> <style>
> <!--
--
Richard Kenward Duty List Mum for Prodig
richard(AT)rkdi.co.uk 44 (0) 1873 890670





=============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE

Reply via email to