> Michael Spillers > I have heard of this fringing before... > Has this been associated only with digital capture or has anyone seen it > in scanned film as well? How prevelant is this artifact?
It has always been there, but accentuated with digital capture. One reason it is noticable now is because digital images are examined at greater magnification than film. Many may have an 8x or 10x lupe, but photographers don't usually have a 1000x microscope to examine trannies closely. Yet fringing is clear at this magnification on a computer screen. >Is there anyway, or any where, I can see this fringing? Yes, I have just posted: www.wheelerstudios.com.au/chromaber/chromabersample/DSCF91901.jpg showing an unprocessed section (top) and corrected section (bottom) BUT! This is such a small part of the whole pic: www.wheelerstudios.com.au/chromaber/chromaberprocessed/DSCF91902.jpg All this with Fuji S2 and Nikkor 14mm lens. Properly corrected, chromatic aberation is not a problem. Processing can be automated and included as part of normal workflow. Tim Wheeler www.wheelerstudios.com.au =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
