I have had many such discussions with other shooters here in my neck of the woods(USA) over the years, including members of ASMP, PP of A, part time shooters and pros alike. The emphasis of the conversations, however, should be what services, supplies, products are billable and NOT who much we bill for each. Regional, local economics, competition, overhead and the VALUE of the photography to each individual client will indeed factor into the cost the market will bear. It is not un reasonable, and certainly acceptable, to charge for time and materials utilized in the production of a product/service, including overhead, maintance, advertising, equipment costs, and even( GASP!!) profit. Usually the problem is not WHAT to charge for but communicating the necessity to charge for services that SEEM to be (?) outside the perceptual realm of "taking a picture"...ie. digital processing, post capture fees, color correction, converting to other file formats, saving files to CD, retouching, etc. MOST ad agencies and designers are aware of these services and the time needed to finish the task and thus are open to billing for such...other clients are not as informed...and here is the key...communication with the client that these services may not be optional, but rather an integral part of the process. We are being forced to have a thorough knowledge of photography AND offset printing, color correction, color seps, retouching so why are we afraid to charge for these services and time??? The answer lies in 2 veins: thorough communication...and "you cannot please everyone all the time"...walk away from those clients.
Andy
===============================================================
GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE

Reply via email to