When I first started working digitally it was aimed at producing files to output to my newly purchased white elephant, the film recorder.(I thought this was the future till Yamaha started selling CD writers 6 months later ) To get the best results wide gamut rgb was recommended,rather sensible when you think about it. To this day that is still my chosen workspace. Its easy enough to convert to srgb or whatever and tweak accordingly before writing to disk for your client despite extending the time taken to complete any given job ! As Neil B rightly says this dumps a lot of colour information but arrives at the right point for the end user. I'm then left with archived files that have lost nothing and that's the way I want it. Once you have discarded the "redundant" colour information and saved your file that's it,goodbye info. I just wish I understood a lot more about colour management :-))
Regards Michael Wilkinson. 106 Holyhead Rd, Ketley, Telford, Shropshire. England .TF1 5DJ 44 (0) 1952 618986. www.infocus-photography.co.uk For Negatives & transparencies from digital files ----- Original Message ----- From: "Neil Barstow" < > To me this is an extremely important issue, since, everywhere, every day, > digi users are clipping scans and camera files in one fell swoop as > they convert images to their chosen workingspace. =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
