There's one minor exception, imho. It may be useful as a temporary index
built at runtime as needed. Throw it away when you don't need it anymore
and certainly don't depend on its accuracy for anything other than the
current task. Of course, there are many other ways to accomplish a
filtered view of data so whether it makes sense to use a unique index is
dependent on the situation.
Vince Teachout wrote:
Unique = BAD
--
Richard Kaye
Artfact/RFC Systems
Voice: 617.219.1038
For the fastest response time, please send your support
queries to:
Technical Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Australian Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All Other Requests - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------
This message has been checked for viruses before sending.
---------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
