On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:41 AM, James E Harvey <jhar...@hanoverpa.com> wrote: > Ok, but I guess we really don't want to be dependent on YouTube in the long > run for this part of our operation, just in case something happens there, > like they might decide to start charging for the service? ------------------- Depend on ... ?
The initial file that you uploaded is still in your hands so you could place it somewhere else if need be, right? From that point you just replace the uri that was pointing to YouTube with the one pointing to it's replacement. That is just data in your database that fulfills the webpages request. To cut to the chase I think you need to relay on as many different resources who do specific tasks well and farm out their resources as needed instead of doing it all on your own. YouTube is one of those resources that you can request a feed from and they will deliver. You were hosting on GoDaddy? The reliability of GD now that it has been purchased may be in question as the new owner is notorious for dismantling everything it buys for secondary profit. -- Stephen Russell Unified Health Services 60 Germantown Court Suite 220 Cordova, TN 38018 Telephone: 888.510.2667 901.246-0159 cell _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYJcH74QdAPB3CkahDs=ozvgyt-jupp-uztj1oskv_e...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
