On 7/2/2012 6:53 PM, Ken Kixmoeller (ProFox) wrote: > I am *not* sorry it has come to this. Pete contributes absolutely > nothing positive to the list. He just throws bomb after bomb after > bomb. > > The list exists because of a large group of very generous technical > folks, willing to share their knowledge for the benefit of all. This > group has spawned a passionate, vocal subgroup on matters politic. I > have gone on and off the "tech-only" list, alternately amused and > irritated by them. Mostly, I am amused, and enjoy hearing alternate > viewpoints, so I have stayed on the full list. OTOH, I have active > twit filters, especially for Pete. > > A couple of months ago, I wrote a rant about him, after seeing the > usual raft of statistics, posting twice as much as anyone else, and > all of it OT (including some not labeled as such). I was advocating a > voluntary moratorium among all of us on any reply to him. Just let his > topics sit there. Knowing Ed's abhorrence of censorship and rules, I > deleted the message without posting it. > > I think the sanction should be permanent. The tech part comes first. > If one can't contribute anything tech, why be here except to throw > bombs? > > I have enjoyed this community for almost as long as it has existed. I > don't want Pete here. I am sick of him.
I share Ken's position. I purposely didn't trim any part of his message because others should read it in its entirety. The man contributes NOTHING of any value whatsoever. -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief Software Architect http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com http://twitter.com/mbabcock16 _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4ff22cfc.8050...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
