We have 2 brother multifunction MFC 8460N I am sure this is outdated now, 
but they work great. We have no plans to change. We use the software that 
came with it. OmniPage. I think we did upgrade the software in the past 3 or 
4 years. I recommend the Brother brand - low cost and reliable. We use the 
auto document sheet feeder a lot and it never fails (as long as you remember 
to remove the staples)

In the past we have had 2 Canon printer/scanners and the auto document feed 
broke on both. Canon refused to fix it even though they were still under the 
1 year warrantee. We will never buy anything with a Canon brand again.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James Harvey" <jhar...@hanoverpa.com>
To: "'ProFox Email List'" <profox@leafe.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 8:31 AM
Subject: [NF] Fast scanner


The company is considering scanning documents at our horse sale next
November, and we are looking for a fast scanner with a small footprint.

Fujitsu has the ScanSnap series, and they look reasonable. The models in
this line have a 20-25 ppm speed, which seems fast.

It would be nice to have a model that allows you to name the individual
scans and send them to a specified folder.

I was wondering if anyone has had experience with the Fujitsu models, or
other brands.

James E Harvey
M.I.S.
Hanover Shoe Farms, Inc.
www.hanoverpa.com
office: 717-637-8931
cell: 717-887-2565
fax: 717-637-6766


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/e68d9df4c10b4283ad662cfd17446...@stratfordsoftware.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to