Dbman was my favorite on SCO,  (another dbase/fox clone) multi platform.. 
I could develop  in dos, deploy multi user in sco xenix . same code.. almost
any os of the time (late 80s and 90') one could run dbman on it..  

http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-apps@vger.rutgers.edu/msg00871.html

Those were the days..  
Bob Lee  



-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Dave
Crozier
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 9:31 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: [NF] Fox on other OS, (was Fast scanner)

Yep,
SCO xenix was a cool O/S especially when you had a host of dumb terminals
attached serially. We used to run our dev system on an ALTOS 4 box with 20Mb
hard drive (That was MASSIVE at the time) and 8 inch floppies. As well as
that we used to develop systems using the OASIS operating system that had a
database actually built into the O/S.

Happy days!

Dave


-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
kamcgin...@gmail.com
Sent: 01 February 2013 03:32
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [NF] Fox on other OS, (was Fast scanner)

Too bad Dr Dave is not still in charge of Fox. The guy was a genius. He
would have it running on everything so we would not be stuck with the M$
crap.

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Almada" <davidalm...@sbcglobal.net>
To: "'ProFox Email List'" <profox@leafe.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 6:15 PM
Subject: RE: [NF] Fast scanner


I use to use FoxBase on a sco xenix system.  It worked great!!!!  You could
run your foxpro programs from multiple locations via remote connections by
loggin into the unix type environment.


 David Almada Consulting
Email: davidalm...@sbcglobal.net   Phone:  619-295-5535
San Diego, California  -  Databases:  FoxPro/SQL/MS-Access Data Translation
- Information Extraction - Migrating Applications

-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
kamcgin...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 5:30 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [NF] Fast scanner

We have a XP machines that we connect to several printers and scanners
including a bank check scanner. They work great. When they break someday, we
will replace them with XP machines. We are stopping with XP. Vista and all
that other Microcrap OS is garbage. That company is living on Bill Gates'
monopoly. They are throwing it away slowly but surely. It is unfortunate
that there is no way to run VFP on Linux. We would jump immediately.

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Almada" <davidalm...@sbcglobal.net>
To: "'ProFox Email List'" <profox@leafe.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 4:58 PM
Subject: RE: [NF] Fast scanner


I use a Brother MFC-7345N and the scanning multiple pages worked great and
loads the software automatically when I used Vista.
But
When I use Windows 7 the software doesn't load automatically and I can only
do one page scan at a time.

I was on the phone with  brother for hours and they were not able to fix
this.

David Almada Consulting
Email: davidalm...@sbcglobal.net   Phone:  619-295-5535
San Diego, California  -  Databases:  FoxPro/SQL/MS-Access Data Translation
- Information Extraction - Migrating Applications


-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
kamcgin...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 10:59 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [NF] Fast scanner

Also Amazon and Costco.


----- Original Message -----
From: "James Harvey" <jhar...@hanoverpa.com>
To: "'ProFox Email List'" <profox@leafe.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 10:07 AM
Subject: RE: [NF] Fast scanner


Thanks for the feedback, I believe our local Staples store sells Brother
equipment, I'll check out their offerings...

James E Harvey
M.I.S.
Hanover Shoe Farms, Inc.
www.hanoverpa.com
office: 717-637-8931
cell: 717-887-2565
fax: 717-637-6766


-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
kamcgin...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 12:56 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [NF] Fast scanner

We have 2 brother multifunction MFC 8460N I am sure this is outdated now,
but they work great. We have no plans to change. We use the software that
came with it. OmniPage. I think we did upgrade the software in the past 3 or
4 years. I recommend the Brother brand - low cost and reliable. We use the
auto document sheet feeder a lot and it never fails (as long as you remember
to remove the staples)

In the past we have had 2 Canon printer/scanners and the auto document feed
broke on both. Canon refused to fix it even though they were still under the
1 year warrantee. We will never buy anything with a Canon brand again.

----- Original Message -----
From: "James Harvey" <jhar...@hanoverpa.com>
To: "'ProFox Email List'" <profox@leafe.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 8:31 AM
Subject: [NF] Fast scanner


The company is considering scanning documents at our horse sale next
November, and we are looking for a fast scanner with a small footprint.

Fujitsu has the ScanSnap series, and they look reasonable. The models in
this line have a 20-25 ppm speed, which seems fast.

It would be nice to have a model that allows you to name the individual
scans and send them to a specified folder.

I was wondering if anyone has had experience with the Fujitsu models, or
other brands.

James E Harvey
M.I.S.
Hanover Shoe Farms, Inc.
www.hanoverpa.com
office: 717-637-8931
cell: 717-887-2565
fax: 717-637-6766


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/003f01ce0098$82ec3430$88c49c90$@1amsoftware.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to