On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Dan Covill <dcov...@san.rr.com> wrote:
> > If you're talking about office PCs, I don't think so. There are two > reasons: > 1) Touch in not a natural fit for desktop devices. PC monitors stand up, > and touch is not a natural motion for something vertical and in front of > you. > 2) Touch is not a natural fit for the kind of applications that run in > the office. Office apps are heavily into displaying lots of info that can > be scrutinized, rearranged, and edited. The mouse does that lots better > than your fingers do. > > There are (see SmartPhones) many things that touch works great for. But > we won't be doing them on PCs. > ---------------------- Voice recognition should be fine in no time at all. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FFRoYhTJQQ> I really see that the reasons touch works on the phone is because the developers thought about what needed to be done. Instead of listening to people say "I only need a phone to make a call!" or "That will never work for people with fat fingers" -- Stephen Russell Sr. Analyst Ring Container Technology Oakland TN 901.246-0159 cell --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYJi_eS+Bhwuntct5Vn+Y07ST=gm9d-pbn-9hqdne2z...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
