On the wayback meter I thought that FP 1&2 had no cdx index. Maybe it was only 1 but I do remember set indexes and having a few in the line of code so all would be updated.
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Fred Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > I do believe FP Dos did have CDX's, FoxBase did not. There also was a SET > or SYS() for NDX/IDX for individual index files, but I don't remember what > exactly it was and I can't seem to find it. > > Fred > > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Dan Covill <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 08/07/13 06:12 AM, Jean MAURICE wrote: > > > >> Even the Foxil works with a newer Foxpro version than 1.02 !!!! > >> I still have FPD2.0 on an old computer and I can try to reindex the > >> files but I don't think that the .dbf memorize the index key of an .idx. > >> I mean that we can't do a simple REINDEX command. > >> > >> On a side note, did you write proAction or did you buy it. In another > >> words have you the source files of it ? > >> > >> The foxil > >> > > > > FP DOS doesn't have .CDX indexes. 1.0 probably doesn't have .IDXes, > > either. I think the originals used .NDX for an index file. > > > > Sounds like he's recovered the .dbfs, but of course the indexes went. No > > way to recreate them from outside without knowing what fields were > indexed. > > His best hope is that there's some kind of Reindex function built into > the > > program (lots of us did that in the early days). > > > > Dan > > > > > > ______________________________**_________________ > > Post Messages to: [email protected] > > Subscription Maintenance: > http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/**listinfo/profox< > http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox> > > OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/** > > listinfo/profoxtech <http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech> > > Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/**search/profox< > http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox> > > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/**byMID/profox/520276EA.1070700@** > > san.rr.com< > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]> > > > > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of > > the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the > > obvious. > > > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cajidmyjwkzrjhwo1b3mjglhch_phibuz378o7idxfxzpwba...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
