<pre> this content <is>      <B> not html encoded <so there> </pre>
??

On 05/06/2014 19:58, Dan Covill wrote:
Our webmaster used PageBreeze for years.  I tried it, and it works pretty well, 
but the problem is that when you do a WysiWig edit on something, it regenerates 
the HTML, frequently generating redundant code and invalid syntax.  I spent a 
lot of time taking out the syntax errors and making the HTML readable, and 
(mostly by accident) tried editing the HTML with my EditPad Pro editor, which 
turned out to know all about the syntax and have several nice testing tools.
If you're going to do WYSIWIG, then put on your Idiot's hat and NEVER TOUCH the 
HTML.  Otherwise, get a real editor.
Dan

Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 11:44:05 -0700
From: j...@san-dc.com
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: [NF]HTML Editor

It's kind of fox because I am working with web connection html form
pages.  I used Kompozer and it blew away my original source.  Mainly it
added "width:" styles and converted all "<" to "&lt;" and same with
">".  It also wrapped some "<%= variable %>" so the browser could not
find "variable".

Is there a free (or reasonable) HTML WYSIWYG editor that prevents this
formatting?

It works great for straight HTML pages but when you are adding text
merge like web connection does, it is not so good. Counter-productive.

TIA

--
Jeff

Jeff Johnson
j...@san-dc.com
SanDC, Inc.
623-582-0323
Fax 623-869-0675

http://www.san-dc.com

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/5390e3d8.3070...@hawthorncottage.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to