Ken,
I seem to remember that in your initial description of this problem you stated
that you 'commented out' the procedure/class definition from the original file.
Exactly how did you do this commenting out?
I've had several instances where I managed to get the same procedure name in
more than one proc file, with the result that the program wasn't using the one
I wanted it to. IIRC, when you SET PROC TO multiple files, and the files
contain duplicate procedures, VFP will use the one that it loaded last. Is
there a possibility that VFP somehow 'saw through' your commenting and used the
old one anyway? Or something.....?
Did you actually REMOVE the original code and try it?
Dan Covill
> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 09:15:00 -0400
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> From: krdib...@stny.rr.com
> Subject: Re: Extreme Case of PRG File Corruption?
>
>
However, this
> did not cause a problem before I moved the *completely unrelated* form
> class out of that procedure file.
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/bay169-w134e14f62262b7273ec995f8a...@phx.gbl
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
