Well, I replied to this 8 hours ago, but my reply didn't make it.

I said that "anything I say is considered [OT]". I didn't think that was
offensive but . . .

Maybe the list has a filter that stops anything with [OT] in the body
text, or something. It ain't easy being green . . .


On 06/12/2017 08:53 PM, Kurt at VR-FX wrote:
> Wow - seems we are ALL in a Agreement!
>
> Hey Pete - what do YOU think??
>
> :-)
> -K-
>
>
> On 6/12/2017 8:46 PM, Vince Teachout wrote:
>> Ugh. No Digest Mode for me, thanks.
>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to