Pete - FYI - I DID see your reply last night - the original one. But, I saw that in my personal home email. Here at work today - will admit I did NOT see that reply. So - who knows - maybe you mistakenly ONLY wrote your reply to me instead of to the list. And, I actually just now checked on my Cell Ph - and that is truly the case - your original reply you ONLY sent to me.
As for your actual comment - maybe anything you said in the Past was always OT - but, this time around - you properly stuck to the topic! Good job!!! :-) Regards, Kurt Wendt Senior Systems Analyst Tel. +1-212-747-9100 www.GlobeTax.com -----Original Message----- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pete Theisen Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 6:56 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [NF] Do you prefer Digest Mode? Well, I replied to this 8 hours ago, but my reply didn't make it. I said that "anything I say is considered [OT]". I didn't think that was offensive but . . . Maybe the list has a filter that stops anything with [OT] in the body text, or something. It ain't easy being green . . . On 06/12/2017 08:53 PM, Kurt at VR-FX wrote: > Wow - seems we are ALL in a Agreement! > > Hey Pete - what do YOU think?? > > :-) > -K- > > > On 6/12/2017 8:46 PM, Vince Teachout wrote: >> Ugh. No Digest Mode for me, thanks. >> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f19005...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
