Paul Hill wrote: > Visual Source Safe also 'requires' the .NET framework. But you can > uninstall it afterwards and VSS works just fine. > Wow...that's interesting....just like the recent post here (within 2 months?) of a web page that required you to install some sort of M$ active-x control, yet others reported that the page worked fine without it. Sounds like "intimidation distribution marketing" or something of that nature. "You must have <this>" they say but it's really not required for now...they just want it to be there for the future.
> I've yet to see a decent .NET app. I like the idea (ditto Java), but > not convinced yet. > I haven't either, but then again, I'm not looking. <g> -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
