And Washington under water is bad why?
--- David Crooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday, February 06, 2007 1:29 PM Ed Leafe > wrote: > > > I love how some people only read half of > something. They see a > term such as "global > >warming" and completely miss the 'global' part of > it. > >Sort of like the same brilliant minds who read the > 2nd Amendment as > guaranteeing the unfettered >right to keep and bear > arms, completely > missing the "well-regulated militia" part. > > Last I checked Albany, NY was on the same globe as > other 'hot' spots! > For true Global Warming, the whole planet would be > getting warmer. That > is not the case and believe that the planet is in > perfect balance. Does > that mean there won't be a problem if the ice caps > melt and the oceans > raise 10 feet? If that happens Washington, DC will > be under water. > > David L. Crooks > > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, > are the opinions of the author, and do not > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are > too stupid to see the obvious. > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
