mrgmhale <> wrote:
>> Is there a
>> way to deliver it with an update CD, automate the setup, etc so the
>> data could be converted - all with little or no user assistance?
> 
> Gawd, I wish!  If you are using VFP remote views, instead of direct
> table hits, it may not be too hard to adapt to the new back end,
> unless you have a lot of hard coded remote views.  But, if you are
> using mostly direct table hits this will be a nightmare no matter
> what rdms you choose.  I am trying to get my hands around a viable
> approach for this exact situation, where one of my VFP apps uses
> mostly direct table connections.  It is going to be a mess, but worth
> it for what I am after.  I expect to start that project this early
> summer.  Perhaps I will look to you for directions by then (?).      

If you are connecting to stored procedures then it's a lot easier.  


Stephen Russell
DBA / .Net Developer

Memphis TN 38115
901.246-0159

"A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who
    can do them absolutely no good." ---Unknown

http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.26/746 - Release Date: 4/4/2007
1:09 PM
 



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to