Over the past 2 years I have been using ZyXEL P-330W Wifi Routers. Not only have they proven reliable, producing excellent range and performance, they are extremely flexible in configuration. For instance, I can set up a ZyXEL as a WiFi Router, with or without DHCP Server for LAN, as a simple swtch that allows the WiFi to work in a LAN as a WAP, as a bridge unit (must have 2 WAPs for this), or as a WiFi WAN enabled unit. Most other WiFi units I have come across are either WAPs or Wifi Routers, not configurable as one or the other. I carry a ZyXEL when I travel as they are so flexible, and more than once having that added felxibility was what gave me the edge in getting something done expediently with no further investment in hardware, or having to wait for the next busienss day and buying another piece of equipment.
Gil > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lou Syracuse > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 1:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [NF] Home Wireless router suggestions > > > Have had a Linksys for a while .. HATE IT! Locks up constantly, has to > be power-cycled several times a day. The wired-only Linksys router I > worked great so i was expecting better - but this one has been > nothing but > trouble. I know I am not alone in having issues with it. Has been > getting worse for the last week or so. it needs to go - now! > > Most of our wireless cards support 802.11g so that would be nice. > Needs a > few wired ports as well, gigbit is nice but not required as only > my notebook > has one. > > Any suggestions? dLink? newer Linksys? Something else? > > > > Lou Syracuse > Senior Programmer/Analyst > Executive Information Systems > Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc. > > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > _ _ _ _ _ > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential > and intended > solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. > If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the > originator of the message. This footer also confirms that this e-mail > message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. > > Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, > except where the sender specifies and with authority, states > them to be the > views of Merle Norman Cosmetics. > > > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > _ _ _ _ _ > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom > they are addressed. > If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the > originator of the message. This footer also confirms that this > e-mail message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. > > Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual > sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, > states them to be the views of Merle Norman Cosmetics. > > > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
