Ed Leafe <> wrote:
> On May 22, 2007, at 12:33 PM, Derek Kalweit wrote:
>
>>> Wow, you actually consider that impartial?
>>
>> Who cares if it's impartial? It only matters that many of those
>> points are dead-on.
>
> Um, if something is slanted, then that means that the points are not
> "dead-on".
>
> The reason why Windows will continue to dominate on the desktop for
> the foreseeable future can be summed up in one word: inertia. Only
> people who care about geek stuff think about this for more than 10
> seconds. They buy whatever they are used to, and that's Windows.
They know it and it's easy. Why F with success when you can waste your time
with NASCAR instead.
Stephen Russell
DBA / .Net Developer
Memphis TN 38115
901.246-0159
"A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who
can do them absolutely no good." ---Unknown
http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.6/814 - Release Date: 5/21/2007
2:01 PM
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
