> Office 2007 is very, very different than all the versions that preceded
> it.

At first I found Office 2007 almost confusing to use, could not see where to
light up the Print menu <g> for a while (I did find it eventually).  But, on
the other hand, for once M$ actually seems to have gotten it right with
their MailMerge interface.  Seems that after Office 2000 they kept dinking
with MailMerge, trying to stupify it so "anyone" could use it - unless that
"anyone" happened to know how to use MailMerge aoready and just wanted to
blow by their stupid forced wizard interface.  In 2007 it is the best
MailMerge interface yet, although I still prefer to use Office 2000 for most
of my stuff.  Luckily I still have my older CDs as one can't get Office 2000
from MSDN any longer, not since M$ tried to force folks away from Java when
Sun sued their asses for trying to create their own M$ enhanced Java,
against Sun's license terms.

Gil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Malcolm Greene
> Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2007 7:16 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [NF] about OEM WinXP
>
>
> > But it seems that most Hong Kong schools require students to
> know and use Micro$oft Office. :)
>
> Office 2007 is very, very different than all the versions that preceded
> it. My recommendation would be to try to find a version of Office 2003
> instead. I haven't come across any customers or schools using Office
> 2007 yet.
>
> Malcolm
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to