Bill Arnold wrote: > Michael, > > I think, for now, the better course of action is just to sell products > and see where we stand in 5 or so years. MS is eventually going to have > to do something about VFP's continuity, and I think they know that. Best > resolution: turn it over to some team that will take it over with > respect for MS's proprietary stuff, but keep it going. >
Bill, M$ did do something about M$'s continuity....they decided not to continue with it! Bill -- why won't you see that it's over in terms of any forward development? Sure, the tool as it currently is will work for another decade+, but what you see is what you get....nothing more than what we've got---with the exception of the great things folks are doing with Sedna/VFPX....and that's some great stuff (e.g., Foxcharts). I don't feel bad about using VFP as it does so much and will continue to work for quite a while, but M$ is done with it. I don't think that could be any more clear than it is today. Seriously though---what more do you want M$ to do with FoxPro? What is VFP not doing now for you? _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
