Michael, > > I think, for now, the better course of action is just to sell products > > and see where we stand in 5 or so years. MS is eventually going to > > have to do something about VFP's continuity, and I think they know > > that. Best resolution: turn it over to some team that will take it over with > > respect for MS's proprietary stuff, but keep it going. > Seriously though---what more do you want M$ to do with > FoxPro? What is VFP not doing now for you?
I may have not been clear enough. I don't expect MS to do anything with FoxPro - other then not kill it. That may take work at some point, I don't know, but if it does someone should be allowed to do it. As far as enhancements, it's been shown that VFP can be used to improve itself, and that's fine with me. Bill _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
