Paul McNett wrote: > Casey McGuire wrote: > That's an easy one to filter out. I think SpamAssassin gives that one > like a +20 or something.
I hear ya. Unfortunately I am the postmaster, webmaster, root, bin.... all that poop. I have been running our mail server for 10+ years now and have gotten about 2 legit emails for postmaster, so you can see why I'm hesitant to get to aggressive with the spam filter. :-) We are currently running SpamAssassin 3.1.4. Been running Spamassassin for a few years now and love it. As much spam as we get now, especially the accounts we have on our webpages, I don't know where I/we would be without it. Will check into tweaking the rules/score for email sent to postmaster. kc _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
