<ggg> Bucking for the title "HellBoy 3", eh?
v/r //SIGNED// Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF 6th MDG Data Services Manager 6th MDG Information System Security Officer Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Harvey Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 10:48 PM To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [OT] "The world should share the cost" of rebuilding theAfghan army -- McCain from today's speech Would you say I'm more arrogant, or more evil?<VBEG> JH -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Helio Wakasugui Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 8:20 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] "The world should share the cost" of rebuilding the Afghan army -- McCain from today's speech You're arrogant. And evil. HW On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:05 PM, John Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sounds like you've just about got it. Then you might throw in the notion of > "enemy of my enemy". You see, in the world, sometimes the people who are > useful for your guvment, are not the same people you might want to hang > with. But, they can be extremely effective at helping fight your enemies. > When they decide to fight you, instead of your enemies, they become an > enemy. I don't really expect you to know much about fighting, being a nerd > and all, but that's kinda the way it goes!<G> > > Let's go over it one more time, just to make sure you get it. > > Enemy of enemy = friend. > Friend of enemy = enemy. > Friend of friend = friend. > Enemy of Friend = enemy. > > Lemme know if you need further instruction. > > John > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Ed Leafe > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 7:35 PM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: Re: [OT] "The world should share the cost" of rebuilding the Afghan > army -- McCain from today's speech > > On Jul 15, 2008, at 6:22 PM, John Harvey wrote: > >> That was back when he was doing what we wanted. When he stopped, and >> started >> harboring terrorists, he messed in his nest. > > > Let's see if I understand: if you kill lots of people, you're A-OK, > > as long as they are people we don't much like. We'll even fund your > killing. But if we withdraw those funds because we don't think you're > useful anymore and you start killing the people threatening you, > you're an evil terrorist. Is that how we're defining these terms now? > > -- Ed Leafe > > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.