I don't think using the word "robbery" in the context of funding public 
education is the right word, regardless of quality of a particular school.

Regards,

LelandJ

Michael Madigan wrote:
> It is a form of robery when someone has to pay for lousy schools.  
>
> ************************************************* 
>  
>
> --- On Sun, 11/2/08, Leland F. Jackson, CPA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   
>> From: Leland F. Jackson, CPA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Re: [OT] Obama's redistribution plan at work
>> To: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com>
>> Date: Sunday, November 2, 2008, 5:10 PM
>> Regarding your statement below, when was support for public
>> education a 
>> form of robbery?  Do you really think funding public
>> education is a form 
>> of robbery, and if so, what are you implying should be
>> done.
>>
>> "They, (eg clear reference to public schools), may not
>> rob us today, but what about tomorrow when they vote for the
>> govt to take our money to give to them, rather than stick a
>> gun in our face and take it themselves."
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> LelandJ
>>
>>
>>
>> Larry Miller wrote:
>>     
>>> Are you suggesting that the public schools are so bad
>>>       
>> they should be bombed?
>>     
>>> Larry Miller
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Leland F. Jackson, CPA 
>>> To: ProFox Email List 
>>> Sent: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 21:48:49 +0000 (UTC)
>>> Subject: Re: [OT] Obama's redistribution plan at
>>>       
>> work
>>     
>>> Are you suggesting we take a neo-conservative approach
>>>       
>> to these kinds of 
>>     
>>> potential problems, and begin per-emptive war against
>>>       
>> the public school 
>>     
>>> system to eliminate all possible future threats?  As
>>>       
>> Senator John McCain 
>>     
>>> put it in rhyme and rhythm; Bomb, Bomb, Bomb -- Bomb
>>>       
>> Bomb Iran, or as 
>>     
>>> you might put it; Bomb, Bomb, Bomb -- Bomb Bomb public
>>>       
>> schools.  LOL
>>     
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> LelandJ
>>>
>>>
>>> Larry Miller wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> If some parts of society were not falling apart,
>>>>         
>> not breaking into a house would not be remarkable.  So why
>> is this such an accomplishment for public schools?  They may
>> not rob us today, but what about tomorrow when they vote for
>> the govt to take our money to give to them, rather than
>> stick a gun in our face and take it themselves.
>>     
>>>> Larry Miller
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: Kristyne McDaniel 
>>>> To: 'ProFox Email List' 
>>>> Sent: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 01:33:52 +0000 (UTC)
>>>> Subject: RE: [OT] Obama's redistribution plan
>>>>         
>> at work
>>     
>>>> John,
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> We home schooled our kids, so that means we
>>>>>           
>> paid taxes and 
>>     
>>>>> didn't get the benefits.
>>>>>     
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> Sure you did. Think of all the kids that went to
>>>>         
>> school during the day
>>     
>>>> instead of robbing your house.
>>>>
>>>> Kristyne McDaniel
>>>> http://www.kristynemcdaniel.com/blog
>>>> http://www.emryldadvantage.com/
>>>> http://www.mcstyles.com/
>>>>  
>>>> Whether you think you can, or you think you
>>>>         
>> can't.... you are right.
>>     
>>>>  -- Henry Ford
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
>>>> multipart/alternative
>>>>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>>>>   text/html
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>         
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to