Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > The mere appointment of Rahm Emanuel to "Chief of Staff" is not a breach of > President-elect Obamas commitment to > set aside partisan politic and unite Americans for the good of our nation.
Hi Leland! You are kidding, right? Might as well say "The mere appointment of the fox to chief of staff of the henhouse" . . . > Michael Oke, II wrote: >> Perhaps you need to be introduced to the fact that here, in the United >> States of America, we are permitted to discuss the choices made by the >> President-elect and compare them to what he said during his campaign. >>>>> Hastert would hardly qualify as a "new tone" selection either. Are you >>>>> trying to tell me that he couldn't have found someone that might >>>>> actually have been able to bridge the chasm that exists between the two >>>>> parties? >>>> I though he did, when he selected Congressman Rahm Emanuel, and btw, who >>>> would you suggest? >>>>>>> http://newsbusters.org/blogs/warner-todd-huston/2008/11/07/obama-already-broken-two-promises-will-media-report >>>>>>> >>>>>>> or >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/67ug7y >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "The first broken promise was the one where the candidate of "change" >>>>>>> was going to bring a new tone to Washington. This one has been broken >>>>>>> by >>>>>>> Obama's choice for Chief of Staff: Rahm Emanuel. Representative Emanuel >>>>>>> (D- Illinois) is a hard-core, far left, liberal as well as being an old >>>>>>> Clinton hack. Not only that, but Emanuel is not a "new tone" kind of >>>>>>> guy >>>>>>> but is a Pit bull of epic proportions. The parallel would have been >>>>>>> McCain claiming a new tone but picking Karl Rove as his Chief of Staff. >>>>>>> Emanuel is little different than Terry MCauliffe or Howard Dean in his >>>>>>> vehement and vocal attacks on Republicans. So much for the "new tone" >>>>>>> Obama claimed he wanted to foster." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "And now comes his second broken promise. Politico reported on November >>>>>>> 5 that Barack Obama has stepped back from his claim that lobbyists >>>>>>> would >>>>>>> not have a place in his new administration." -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
