According to Dick Morris, Bill Clinton couldn't trust Emanuel because he would selectively leak information to the press to make himself look good.
************************************************* Barack Obama is not My President http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike --- On Sat, 11/8/08, Leland F. Jackson, CPA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Leland F. Jackson, CPA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [OT] O-boy breaks 2 promises already > To: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com> > Date: Saturday, November 8, 2008, 5:42 PM > The Chief of Staff, like the vice president, serves the > president and is > duty bound to reconcile to the President's wishes, so > I'm sure, if Rahm > Emanuel become too divisive, abrasive, or contentious, > President Obama > will straighten him out. LOL The mere appointment of Rahm > Emanuel to > "Chief of Staff" is not a breach of > President-elect Obamas commitment to > set aside partisan politic and unite Americans for the good > of our nation. > > Regards, > > LelandJ > > Michael Oke, II wrote: > > Perhaps you need to be introduced to the fact that > here, in the United > > States of America, we are permitted to discuss the > choices made by the > > President-elect and compare them to what he said > during his campaign. > > > > ::michael > > > > Ricardo Aráoz wrote: > > > >> All of you reps... YOU LOST. > >> The man won and he does NOT owe you nothing and > he's not asking for YOUR > >> permission. So shut your asses! If you don't > like what he's doing then > >> wait a few years and campaign. After all, that is > democracy. > >> > >> > >> Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > >> > >>> Michael Oke, II wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> Hastert would hardly qualify as a > "new tone" selection either. Are you > >>>> trying to tell me that he couldn't > have found someone that might > >>>> actually have been able to bridge the > chasm that exists between the two > >>>> parties? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> I though he did, when he selected Congressman > Rahm Emanuel, and btw, who > >>> would you suggest? > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> LelandJ > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> ::michael > >>>> > >>>> Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> And who would you have picked, former > speaker of the house Denis > >>>>> Hastert? LOL > >>>>> > >>>>> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNIqZEDghMU > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, > >>>>> > >>>>> LelandJ > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Pete Theisen wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hi Everybody! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > http://newsbusters.org/blogs/warner-todd-huston/2008/11/07/obama-already-broken-two-promises-will-media-report > >>>>>> > >>>>>> or > >>>>>> > >>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/67ug7y > >>>>>> > >>>>>> "The first broken promise was > the one where the candidate of "change" > >>>>>> was going to bring a new tone to > Washington. This one has been broken by > >>>>>> Obama's choice for Chief of > Staff: Rahm Emanuel. Representative Emanuel > >>>>>> (D- Illinois) is a hard-core, far > left, liberal as well as being an old > >>>>>> Clinton hack. Not only that, but > Emanuel is not a "new tone" kind of guy > >>>>>> but is a Pit bull of epic > proportions. The parallel would have been > >>>>>> McCain claiming a new tone but > picking Karl Rove as his Chief of Staff. > >>>>>> Emanuel is little different than > Terry MCauliffe or Howard Dean in his > >>>>>> vehement and vocal attacks on > Republicans. So much for the "new tone" > >>>>>> Obama claimed he wanted to > foster." > >>>>>> > >>>>>> "And now comes his second > broken promise. Politico reported on November > >>>>>> 5 that Barack Obama has stepped > back from his claim that lobbyists would > >>>>>> not have a place in his new > administration." > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > >> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
