Thanks for your efforts in this area. I had incorporated 7-zip into FabMate some time ago but wasn't happy 100% with it. To be fair, perhaps it was something else in my process that wasn't working exactly right. Oh well...such is the price for running VFP9 on Linux. <gd&r>
On Mon, December 1, 2008 7:34 am, Kevin Cully wrote: > To be honest, this is the first time I've incorporated a compression > tool since way back in the 20th century (I like saying that) when we used > DynaZip. I tried 7-zip on the desktop but I prefer ZipGenius on > the desktop. > > Craig's VFPCompression seems pretty speedy though. I think once I have > some unit tests, it will (A) expose areas that can be improved and (B) give > confidence that when upgrading from one version of VFPCompression to > another that the functionality hasn't changed. > > -Kevin > CULLY Technologies, LLC > > > > MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: > >> Kevin Cully wrote: >> >>> For all using the VFPCompression.fll, there's an update: >>> http://tinyurl.com/6er3f6 >>> >>> >>> I'll try to do some testing. Dang, I wish I wrote some unit tests to >>> go along with my class library. On my to-do list. >>> >>> -Kevin >>> CULLY Technologies, LLC >>> >> >> >> Thanks, Kevin! >> >> >> How would you say Craig's VFPCompression tool is better than using >> 7-zip >> in your VFP apps? >> >> >> >> >> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
