Michael, I know we're not talking DoD security here, but I find the ZipString & UnzipString functions quite handy in storing character data in fields that I don't want any casual "Browsers" to see since I do have some clients that have VFP (dangerous) on their desktops. As in keeping honest people honest.
When I use a commercial framework I prefer a modified Codebook with Security by Juan. I've been using these functions instead of the "62" & "10" functions to load the "table#" tables with Security Labels, ID's, Objects, etc.. On another note, I've noticed a distinct increase in form loading time on slower machines. Francis -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions General Account Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2008 10:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: VFPCompression.FLL update 11/30/2008 Kevin Cully wrote: > For all using the VFPCompression.fll, there's an update: > http://tinyurl.com/6er3f6 > > I'll try to do some testing. Dang, I wish I wrote some unit tests to > go along with my class library. On my to-do list. > > -Kevin > CULLY Technologies, LLC Thanks, Kevin! How would you say Craig's VFPCompression tool is better than using 7-zip in your VFP apps? [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
