A progressive tax rate seem to be working great for China. If you think the income tax rates are high in the USA, I really would not like the income tax rates in China:
http://www.worldwide-tax.com/china/china_tax.asp Regards, LelandJ On 04/27/2010 06:16 AM, Publius Maximus wrote: > http://bit.ly/blcZCB > > - - - > It is a truly tragic development that in America -- a country founded > on the principle of the inviolability of private property -- half of > us prey on the substance of our neighbors. > > A striking 37-second video moment made it to the internet last week. > > [video clip] > > It was taken at a demonstration of public-sector unions in > Springfield, Illinois marching in support of the proposed tax > increases in that state. The clip features a public school teacher, an > African-American lady, who carries a couple of placards while > shouting: "Where is the money? Where is the money? ... Give up the > bucks! Where is the cash? We need it fast!" > > The video is an eye-opening illustration of what taxes are ultimately > about: Americans helping themselves to the property of other > Americans. > > According to the latest data, almost half of all Americans pay no > federal income tax. Commenting on this fact, nationally syndicated > columnist Phyllis Schlafly recently observed that April 15 "now > divides Americans into two almost equal classes: those who pay for the > services provided by government and the freeloaders." > > "Freeloaders" is not, however, an altogether fitting term, since > freeloaders merely take advantage of propitious circumstances. In a > free-for-all democracy, on the other hand, many non-payers or net > tax-consumers purposefully vote for those who promise to give them of > their neighbors' substance. What these people do is, in effect, > stealing. They are thieves, and it matters not that the theft in which > they participate is state-sanctioned. After all, what name other than > "thieves" can describe those who forcefully deprive others of their > money in order to enrich themselves? > > If the lady in the video wants to enrich herself at others' expense, > she should be forced to do it the old fashioned way: by breaking into > someone's house. Sadly, these days, she does not have to summon even > that much initiative. She can simply vote for a politician who will do > the dirty deed for her. If a thief gets caught with a couple of > thousand dollars' worth of stolen goods, the chances are that he will > end up in jail, humiliated and despised. Those, however, who vote for > politicians who deprive productive citizens of tens of thousands of > dollars every year never despise themselves. Quite the contrary: They > consider themselves progressive, socially conscious, or enlightened. > - - - > > The income tax is immoral, and our Founders invented a better way to > provide for the federal government's funding. > > Quoth Abraham Lincoln: "The tariff is the cheaper system. By the > direct tax system, assessors and collectors must be sent forth across > the land like a swarm of Egyptian locusts. By the tariff system, the > man who contents himself to live on the products of his country pays > no tax at all." > > - Publius > > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4bd709c8.3080...@mail.smvfp.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
