On 3/6/2011 1:43 PM, Mike Copeland wrote:
> I figured the same...I thought that the code for "everything 7" had
> already been installed with the Home package and given a Home, or Pro,
> or Ultimate authorization code, Win7 would act accordingly...turning on
> and off features. Not so.
>
> After putting in the $77 code, it took about 10 to 15 minutes to
> download and install quite a bit of stuff. (No idea what or how much as
> the screen was pretty non-informative as the process progressed.) The
> process also rebooted twice...good old Windows...just to let me know it
> was authentic.
>
> I did find, also, that sys(3050,1) throws an error on the 64-bit Win7
> Pro, but not the 32-bit Home or Pro. That was in the SETMEM.PRG routine
> that I got from Ed's board years ago. I could be wrong because I didn't
> spend a lot of time testing, but it didn't appear that sys(3050) did
> anything at all in any of the versions of Win7.


That's why I told you that you'd have to adjust it to set the max memory 
at 2 GB (?) since Vista and beyond can go higher.  I think I set mine to 
just ignore SetMemory's code if the OS() was higher than XP's value. 
Not the best fix, but quick fix for now.  OR, I used values like 1600000 
and 800000 for foreground/background respectively (by force instead of 
letting calculations be used).

-- 
Mike Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
President, Chief Software Architect
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
http://twitter.com/mbabcock16

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to