Yes, that seems wrong. It should be
i. :.+
shouldn't it?
Henry Rich
On 11/4/2012 10:15 PM, km wrote:
Henry, what do you make of
i. :. (i. :. +) b. _1
i. :.+ :.i.
?
Kip Murray
Sent from my iPad
On Nov 4, 2012, at 5:45 PM, Henry Rich <henryhr...@nc.rr.com> wrote:
i. :. (i. :. +) ^:_1 ^:_1 ]5
0 1 2 3 4
The obverse of i. :. (i. :. +) should be (i. :. +), and
the obverse of that should be + . I think. But it isn't.
Henry Rich
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
