Thanks Roger! On https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Exponentiation  0^0 is 
discussed. I need all the help I can get. Your information is very welcome. 
Thank you! Bo.





Den 21:30 fredag den 17. januar 2014 skrev Roger Hui 
<rogerhui.can...@gmail.com>:
 
BTW, Knuth did something else which typifies APL thinking.  In a note or
>paper (I can not find it now), he argued strongly that 1=0^0, not
>undefined, not 0, not anything else.  The common conventional statement of
>a polynomial, p(x)=sigma(k=0;k<=n) a[k]*x^k, requires that x^0 be 1.  Some
>writers are aware of this dependency and, being careful, write instead the
>ugly p(x)=a[0]+sigma(k=1;k<=n)a[k]*x^k.
>
>Attention to edge cases is typical of APL thinking.  It's another way to
>stay in the world of expressions and away from the world of statements.
>You know:
>
>if k=0 then
>a[0]
>else
>a[k]*x^k
>endif
>
>
>
>
>
>On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Roger Hui <rogerhui.can...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> One aspect:  J/APL programmers tend to stay in the nice world of
>> expressions and avoid the nastier world of statements.  This tendency
>> pushes you towards array thinking and away from scalar thinking.
>>
>> For example, if b is a boolean array, and you want 4 where b is 0 and 17
>> where b is 1, write:
>>
>> (4*0=b)+(17*1=b)
>>
>> And of course the signs of real numbers x are:
>>
>> (x>0)-(x<0)
>>
>> Even Knuth, an eminent mathematician and computer scientist but not an APL
>> programmer, knows to <strike>steal</strike> adopt this idea.  See: Knuth, 
>> *Two
>> Notes on Notation* <http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/math/pdf/9205/9205211v1.pdf>,
>> 1992-05-01.  In the first half of the paper he describes how "Iverson's
>> convention" can be used to simplify the statement and manipulation of sums.
>>
>> See also:
>>
>> http://www.jsoftware.com/papers/perlis77.htm
>> http://www.jsoftware.com/papers/perlis78.htm
>> http://www.jsoftware.com/papers/APLQA.htm#Perlis-foreword
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Joe Bogner <joebog...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I went googling for some deeper material on how to think like an APL
>>> programmer. I have read/skimmed through a good set of the material on
>>> http://jsoftware.com/papers/ and have skimmed through many of the
>>> books listed on http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Books.
>>>
>>> Are there any specific recommendations, free or for purchase? Or,
>>> perhaps I should spend more time with the list above.
>>>
>>> I found this, The APL Idiom List by Perlis and Rugaber, which looks
>>> similar to what I'm looking for:
>>> http://archive.vector.org.uk/resource/yaleidioms.pdf.
>>>
>>> The review of this book looks like what I'm after,
>>>
>>> http://www.amazon.com/Handbook-APL-programming-Clark-Wiedmann/dp/0884050262
>>> ,
>>> constructing useful programs and going into more depth.
>>>
>>> Or something of the style of The Little Schemer,
>>> http://scottn.us/downloads/The_Little_Schemer.pdf
>>>
>>> I searched the forum and had trouble finding a relevant post
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>
>>
>>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to