Raul wrote: > Here's a variant on mine which only uses J primitives:
Ah, I love the power of that approach. We’ll make a F^4 convert of you yet. Now, the stupid-J-tricks fan in me wonders if we could have a version which derives its power from a different primitive, as a kind of bilateral bond. (Coming up with suggestive language without revealing too much is also kind of a fun game. The J version of double-entendres.) -Dan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
