On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Dan Bron <[email protected]> wrote:
> Now, the stupid-J-tricks fan in me wonders if we could have a version which
> derives its power from a different primitive, as a kind of bilateral bond.
>
> (Coming up with suggestive language without revealing too much is also kind
> of a fun game. The J version of double-entendres.)
This?
v 'J double-entrende'
J d o u b l e - e n t r e n d e
J d o u b l e - e n t r e n d
J d o u b l e - e n t r e n
J d o u b l e - e n t r e
J d o u b l e - e n t r
J d o u b l e - e n t
J d o u b l e - e n
J d o u b l e - e
J d o u b l e -
J d o u b l e
J d o u b l
J d o u b
J d o u
J d o
J d
J
J
V=: }."0 1~ i.@#
V=: V :. V f.
v=: (1j1 # |.)"1&.V@|.
Or am I stealing all the fun?
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Dan Bron <[email protected]> wrote:
> Raul wrote:
>> Here's a variant on mine which only uses J primitives:
>
>
> Ah, I love the power of that approach. We’ll make a F^4 convert of you yet.
>
> Now, the stupid-J-tricks fan in me wonders if we could have a version which
> derives its power from a different primitive, as a kind of bilateral bond.
>
> (Coming up with suggestive language without revealing too much is also kind
> of a fun game. The J version of double-entendres.)
>
> -Dan
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
