Thanks. I can render it in pdflatex with the change you suggested. There is no standalone class in my tex, so I also changed it to article in the first line.
I can't tell which version of diagrams are better. If one doesn't understand J concept of verb rank and assemble, all diagrams are confusing. If one already understand, he can know what the diagram intended to show. On Thu, Apr 2, 2020, 5:57 PM Hauke Rehr <[email protected]> wrote: > It’s tex code, to be compiled with lualatex. > You may use pdflatex instead but need to change > the package “luainputenc” to “inputenc“. > > > Am 02.04.20 um 05:54 schrieb 'Jim Russell' via Programming: > > Sorry, how should I convert that into a viewable diagram. > > Thanks! > > > >> On Apr 1, 2020, at 11:17 PM, Hauke Rehr <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Actually, I’m a little bit confused as well: > >> I thought I understood it but obviously didn’t > >> so I tried redoing the diagram but with one > >> set of arrows altered. > >> Am I right these should be different or do I > >> misinterprete the way atop is meant to work? > >> > >> thanks > >> > >> Am 29.03.20 um 03:36 schrieb ethiejiesa via Programming: > >>> Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Another possible way to emphasize what's going on here might be to > >>>> split 'v' up into multiple instances (one for each cell) in the & > >>>> case. (Though, there, drawing a box around the 'v' part, to show the > >>>> scope of the verb and distinguish the definition from the application > >>>> -- possibly even backed up by another sentence or something? -- might > >>>> be even more important.) > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>> Perhaps the disagreement stems from difference in experience. > >>> I sympathize with Sergey's confusion. When first coming to J a few > months ago, I was confused by the exact same diagram. It only started > making sense for me once the ideas of rank/splitting/reassembly and & vs @ > composition had already clicked. > >>> So I feel like the diagram is a great illustration of the concepts but > there is perhaps a need for some pedagogy that demonstrates the initial > problem: What mechanical questions come up when trying to combine verbs? > Which naturally leads to wanting the four composition primitives. > >>> Is there a wiki page that already addresses this kind of thing? I > might try writing one up and sharing it on Jgeneral anyway, in the off > chance it fills a need. > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >> > >> -- > >> ---------------------- > >> mail written using NEO > >> neo-layout.org > >> > <atampco.tex.txt>---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > -- > ---------------------- > mail written using NEO > neo-layout.org > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
