#326: Users need to see their total citations in a given year
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  hoc         |      Owner:  valkyrie
      Type:              |     Status:  assigned
  enhancement            |  Milestone:
  Priority:  major       |    Version:
 Component:  WebSearch   |   Keywords:  INSPIRE citations cites citesummary
Resolution:              |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Comment (by tbrooks):

 Replying to [comment:7 valkyrie]:
 > Travis, if you want to look at my branches, the invenio and INSPIRE ones
 are both called 326-narrow_citing_papers (this isn't really an accurate
 branch title for the invenio part, but whatever).


 Haven't looked yet, in the middle of several other things, but will try
 Sunday.   Bug me if no feedback by Monday AM.
 >
 > Questions:
 > 0) does the narrowing belong in invenio or INSPIRE?

 Great question.   Tibor, opinion?   I think this is Invenio, but the PDG
 stuff is clearly INSPIRE specific, so we could start there and expand?

 > If it's invenio, it will probably not get committed unless it uses a
 real search box rather than a js box (as it uses now).

 Not sure about that.  js box might be fine.  I sort of like that.

 > This has both good points and bad points.  It would serve users who
 don't have js on their machines, but it would also be beastly to write
 with the alternative search box thing working as it does.

 Maybe Tibor can comment on that?

 > 1) what should those summary numbers be called?  As I said, I personally
 think that they are currently confusing as labelled, but I don't have a
 better idea for what to put yet.

 Comments to follow on that.

 > 2) Did you want remove RPP or remove PDG?  Or both?

 Hah, sorry.   The link should say "Remove PDG Review from stats" The
 search should be "not t rpp"   Rpp is the title, PDG are the authors...

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://invenio-software.org/ticket/326#comment:8>
Invenio <http://invenio-software.org>

Reply via email to