orang waras kalo bikin salah itu minta maaf, bukan nge goblok2in orang lain.

goblok sih lu, sampe urusan mencet aja kagak becus.

--- In proletar@yahoogroups.com, item abu <itemabu@...> wrote:
>
> Goblok, gua salah pencet aja ni orang kagak ngarti. Betul2 dungu.
>  
> 
> From: Musik hari Ini <musikhariini@...>
> >To: "proletar@yahoogroups.com" <proletar@yahoogroups.com> 
> >Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2012 10:29 AM
> >Subject: Re: [proletar] Re: Paradoks Islam Indonesia + Insight: How Islamic 
> >are Islamic countries? A rejoinder
> >
> >
> >  
> >Mana jawaban elu postingan kosong?jadi omong kosong pengetahuan agamalu cetek
> >baru taraf percaya doang belum yakin
> >mendingan balik keagama asli lu gimana tidak elu cuman bicara vulgar doang 
> >tiap hari
> >
> >tidak ada isinya................tong kosong.
> >
> >________________________________
> >From: item abu <itemabu@...>
> >To: "proletar@yahoogroups.com" <proletar@yahoogroups.com> 
> >Sent: Monday, February 6, 2012 8:30 PM
> >Subject: Re: [proletar] Re: Paradoks Islam Indonesia + Insight: How Islamic 
> >are Islamic countries? A rejoinder
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> >From: Musik hari Ini <musikhariini@...>
> >>To: "proletar@yahoogroups.com" <proletar@yahoogroups.com> 
> >>Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2012 6:01 AM
> >>Subject: Re: [proletar] Re: Paradoks Islam Indonesia + Insight: How Islamic 
> >>are Islamic countries? A rejoinder
> >>
> >>
> >>  
> >>pertanyaan:
> >>
> >>jelasin ttng ayat kidung agung 7:6-9 yg dikatakan Porno tsb? 
> >>
> >>Terimakasih
> >>
> >>________________________________
> >>From: item abu <itemabu@...>
> >>To: "proletar@yahoogroups.com" <proletar@yahoogroups.com> 
> >>Sent: Monday, February 6, 2012 5:10 PM
> >>Subject: Re: [proletar] Re: Paradoks Islam Indonesia + Insight: How Islamic 
> >>are Islamic countries? A rejoinder
> >>
> >>
> >>  
> >>Gua kasih perbandingan.
> >> 
> >>auloh lu itu tukang tipu, nipu orang di Quran dan ngehalalin sumpah palsu. 
> >>Di Kristen, orang dilarang nipu dan dusta, ga ada perkecualian.
> >> 
> >>Islam bilang ga boleh ngebunuh kecuali dgn alasan yg benar. Jadi ngebunuh 
> >>kafir musuh auloh itu boleh dan wajib, ngebunuh murtad itu boleh dan wajib. 
> >>Kristen bilang ga boleh ngebunuh, titik, tanpa kecuali.
> >> 
> >>Pake otak lu unt nentuin yg mana yg benar.
> >> 
> >>
> >>From: Abbas <abas_amin08@...>
> >>>To: proletar@yahoogroups.com 
> >>>Sent: Monday, February 6, 2012 10:19 AM
> >>>Subject: [proletar] Re: Paradoks Islam Indonesia + Insight: How Islamic 
> >>>are Islamic countries? A rejoinder
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  
> >>>Kamu kampanye negative terus ?
> >>>Coba kini kampanyekan agama yang bagus ! misalnya kristen !
> >>>Nah mungkin aku tertarik. Coba kamu kampanyekan !
> >>>Aku ingin denger !
> >>>Atau menurutmu tak ada satupun agama yang baek !?
> >>>Coba aku ingin tahu !
> >>>
> >>>--- In proletar@yahoogroups.com, item abu <itemabu@> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Islam itu nyembah tukang tipu, ngehalalin ngibul dan ngefitnah, nyuruh 
> >>>> malak dan ngerampok kafir, ngasih pahala ke yg ngebantai kafir, 
> >>>> ngehalalin pedophilia, merkosa dan segala kejahatan lainnya. Ga heran 
> >>>> kalo negara amburadul krn dikuasai orang islam.
> >>>>  
> >>>>  
> >>>> 
> >>>> From: Sunny <ambon@>
> >>>> >To: Undisclosed-Recipient@ 
> >>>> >Sent: Monday, February 6, 2012 7:48 PM
> >>>> >Subject: [proletar] Paradoks Islam Indonesia + Insight: How Islamic are 
> >>>> >Islamic countries? A rejoinder
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >  
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Ref: Bagi yang mau membaca artikel Scheherazade S. Rehman and Hossein 
> >>>> >Askari bisa download pada : 
> >>>> >http://www.mendeley.com/research/islamic-islamic-countries-11/
> >>>> >
> >>>> >http://www.analisadaily.com/news/read/2012/02/04/33586/paradoks_islam_indonesia/#.Ty_G1fnPzRU
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Sabtu, 04 Feb 2012 00:52 WIB
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Paradoks Islam Indonesia
> >>>> >Oleh : Ahmad Khotim Muzakka. 
> >>>> >Dalam sebuah pengajian di DI Yogyakarta, Pengasuh Pesantren Raudlatuth 
> >>>> >Thalibin, Rembang Kyai Ahmad Mustofa Bisri menerangkan bahwa yang 
> >>>> >paling bertanggungjawab terhadap kondisi Indonesia saat ini adalah 
> >>>> >orang Muslim. Itu karena orang Islam merupakan kelompok terbesar yang 
> >>>> >menghuni negara Maritim ini. Pada tahun 2010, umat Islam mencapai angka 
> >>>> >85,1 persen dari total 240.271.522 penduduk Indonesia. Gus Mus, sebutan 
> >>>> >akrab beliau, melanjutkan umat Islam lah yang harus berdiri, berbaris 
> >>>> >di depan dan bertanggungjawab atas keterpurukan bangsa ini.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Pernyataan tersebut bukan hendak menegaskan kelompok agama yang lain 
> >>>> >yang bertanggungjawab terhadap nasib Indonesia. Melainkan karena lebih 
> >>>> >pada kuantitas penduduk Indonesia yang didominasi orang Islam. Gus Mus 
> >>>> >mengandaikan diadakannya survei tentang umat Islam yang mempunyai 
> >>>> >Al-Quran di rumah. Kemudian dilanjutkan dengan pertanyaan lanjutan; 
> >>>> >berapa persen yang membaca, berapa persen yang memahami, dan yang lebih 
> >>>> >penting berapa persen yang mengamalkan.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Jika survei semacam ini dilaksanakan, Gus Mus optimis segala bentuk 
> >>>> >permasalahan di Indonesia bisa dipecahkan lahan-perlahan. Karena semua 
> >>>> >kitab suci-sebenarnya tidak hanya kitab suci umat Islam-mengajarkan 
> >>>> >hal-hal baik. Terutama perkara yang berhubungan dengan hajat hidup 
> >>>> >orang banyak. 
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Pesan Penting
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Peringatan itu seperti relevan dengan hasil penelitian Sheherazade S. 
> >>>> >Rehman dan Hossein Askari dari The George Washington University. Kedua 
> >>>> >peneliti itu menempatkan Indonesia pada peringkat ke-140 dari 208 
> >>>> >negara dalam sebuah penelitian bertajuk "How Islamic are Islamic 
> >>>> >Countries" (Global Economy Journal: 2010). Negara yang menempati posisi 
> >>>> >puncak adalah Selandia Baru, disusul Luxemburg di urutan kedua.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Ada empat indikator yang digunakan dua peneliti ini untuk mengukur 
> >>>> >sejauh mana sebuah negara dikategorikan sebagai yang Islami. Pertama, 
> >>>> >sistem ekonomi dan prinsip keadilan dalam politik serta kehidupan 
> >>>> >sosial. Kedua, sistem perundang-undangan dan pemerintahan. Ketiga, hak 
> >>>> >asasi manusia dan hak politik. Keempat, ajaran Islam berkaitan dengan 
> >>>> >hubungan Internasional dan masyarakat non-Muslim. Sedangkan indikator 
> >>>> >yang bersifat personal yakni; ajaran Islam mengenai hubungan seseorang 
> >>>> >dengan Tuhan dan hubungan sesama manusia, tidak disertakan.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Dari keempat indikator yang dijadikan acuan, terlihat bahwa Indonesia 
> >>>> >sebagai negeri berpenduduk Muslim terbesar di dunia belum benar-benar 
> >>>> >menerapkan prinsip-prinsip utama ber-Islam, terutama kaitannya dengan 
> >>>> >negara. Banyaknya kecurangan di bidang politik, timpangnya perekonomian 
> >>>> >dan kesejahteraan masyarakat, serta merebaknya korupsi yang merajalela 
> >>>> >menjadikan Indonesia menempati peringkat yang "mengecewakan". Hal ini 
> >>>> >tentu menjadi koreksi besar-besaran terhadap ke-Islam-an Indonesia yang 
> >>>> >bangga dengan kuantitas. Sedangkan masalah kualitas ber-Islam, yang 
> >>>> >disertai segala atributnya, belum menjadi perhatian utama. 
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Penelitian itu cukup mengejutkan. Dari 56 negara OKI, yang memperoleh 
> >>>> >nilai tertinggi adalah Malaysia (urutan ke-38), Kuwait (48), Uni Emirat 
> >>>> >Arab (66), Maroko (119), Arab Saudi (131), Indonesia (140), Pakistan 
> >>>> >(147), Yaman (198), dan terburuk adalah Somalia (206). Sedangkan negara 
> >>>> >Barat yang dinilai mendekati nilai-nilai Islam adalah Kanada di urutan 
> >>>> >ke-7, Inggris (8), Australia (9), dan Amerika Serikat (25).
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Hasil penelitian itu, sudah selayaknya menjadikan negara Indonesia mau 
> >>>> >menginstrospeksi terhadap keislamannya selama ini. Sebagai bangsa yang 
> >>>> >masih terus belajar, mestinya kita terpacu untuk memperbaiki diri. 
> >>>> >Abdurrahman Wahid (Islamku, Islam Anda, Islam Kita) menegaskan bahwa 
> >>>> >baik moralitas sekuler dari sebuah ideologi duniawi seperti Komunisme, 
> >>>> >maupun moralitas agama yang digunakan dalam pengembangan sistem 
> >>>> >politik, haruslah dibaca sebagai keniscayaan sebuah pemerintahan yang 
> >>>> >benar-benar bertanggung jawab pada rakyat. Gus Dur tidak membedakan 
> >>>> >antara negeri yang menyatakan diri sebagai negara Islam atau negara 
> >>>> >sekuler. Yang terpenting adalah negara itu menerapkan prinsip yang 
> >>>> >mendukung hal itu terwujud.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Nah, melihat kesemrawutan Indonesia yang tak hanya di bidang politik, 
> >>>> >ekonomi, dan sosial, melainkan juga pada sikap berbudaya manusianya, 
> >>>> >bangsa Indonesia mesti memahami bahwa Islam bukan sebatas penamaan 
> >>>> >belaka. Islam merupakan perkara yang tak cukup dilisankan, juga 
> >>>> >dituliskan. Lebih dari itu Islam adalah pengamalan. Melihat hasil 
> >>>> >penelitian di atas, kita boleh mengajukan pertanyaan, benarkah 
> >>>> >negara-negara Barat lebih Islami daripada negara-negara yang mengaku 
> >>>> >diri sebagai negara Islam? Ini perkara pelik, namun kita mesti 
> >>>> >menginsafi diri agar bisa memandang lebih jernih dan lebih adil menilai 
> >>>> >pribadi.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Lebih parahnya, Islam sering dijadikan tameng untuk berlindung atas 
> >>>> >ketidakpatutan dalam hukum positif. Sekadar contoh, apa yang dikatakan 
> >>>> >Ozhak Sihotang, pengacara Sofyan Usman terkait dugaan korupsi kliennya 
> >>>> >sangat tidak pantas diutarakan. Katanya, "saat itu Pak Sofyan kan 
> >>>> >anggota Banggar DPR juga. Saat itu membantu memperjuangkan anggaran 
> >>>> >Otorita Batam, dan cair Rp 85 miliar. Pak Sofyan tidak meminta apa-apa, 
> >>>> >hanya meminta agar dibantu dalam pembangunan masjid. "Jadi itu proyek 
> >>>> >akhirat, tidak untuk kepentingan pribadi." (Detiknews, 24/12)
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Sebagaimana diberitakan Sofyan Usman, mantan anggota DPR periode lalu, 
> >>>> >disidangkan atas kasus dugaan korupsi Otorita Batam di Pengadilan 
> >>>> >Tipikor. Sofyan diduga menerima uang Rp 150 juta dan cek pelawat Rp 850 
> >>>> >juta. Namun Sofyan berkelit, dia tidak menerima sepeser uang pun. Uang 
> >>>> >seluruhnya disumbangkan untuk pembangunan masjid.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Kasus seolah menegaskan hasil penelitian di atas. Bahwa Islam belum 
> >>>> >sepenuhnya diimani sebagai perilaku dan pengamalan. Islam baru 
> >>>> >dirayakan saat upacara keagamaan, seperti hari raya. Selebihnya, kita 
> >>>> >sangat berbangga dengan kesalahan sosial yang kita lakukan setiap hari 
> >>>> >seperti shalat, zakat, puasa, dan haji. Beginikah kita memperlakukan 
> >>>> >agama?***
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Penulis adalah Peneliti pada Idea Studies IAIN Walisongo, Semarang.
> >>>> >++++
> >>>> >http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/11/12/insight-how-islamic-are-islamic-countries-a-rejoinder.html
> >>>> >Insight: How Islamic are Islamic countries? A rejoinder
> >>>> >Bahtiar Effendy, Jakarta | Sat, 11/12/2011 9:15 AM 
> >>>> >Prof. Komaruddin Hidayat, the rector of Syarif Hidayatullah State 
> >>>> >Islamic University (UIN), wrote an interesting column in 
> >>>> >Jakarta’s leading newspaper on Indonesian Islamicity. His 
> >>>> >article is a rejoinder to a study conducted by Scheherazade S. Rehman 
> >>>> >and Hossein Askari from George Washington University. 
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Published in the Berkeley-based Global Economy Journal, Volume 10, 
> >>>> >2010, this study examines if policies of the Muslim world were founded 
> >>>> >on Islamic teachings in comparison to those in non-Muslim countries. 
> >>>> >All up, 208 countries were studied.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Indicators such as economic opportunity, economic freedom, equal access 
> >>>> >to education, corruption, financial systems and human rights were used 
> >>>> >to measure the degree of Islamicity in those countries. The results 
> >>>> >were hilarious. â€Å"Most self-declared and labeled Islamic countries 
> >>>> >are not conducting their affairs in accordance with Islamic teachings 
> >>>> >â€" at least when it comes to economic, financial, political, legal, 
> >>>> >social and governance policies.�
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Thus, this study was basically a critical assessment of the Muslim 
> >>>> >world with respect to their social, economic and political practices, 
> >>>> >which did not seem to confirm the substance of Islamic values. Not only 
> >>>> >that, this study put the Muslim world at the lower end of the list, but 
> >>>> >it also put many of the non-Muslim countries at a much higher position. 
> >>>> >New Zealand, for instance, was listed near the top as a result of this 
> >>>> >study. Luxembourg came second. The highest among the Muslim countries 
> >>>> >was Malaysia, at 38th place, whereas Indonesia, as the largest, 
> >>>> >predominantly Muslim country, ranked 140th.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >In fairness, this is not a novel study. It may be the first to provide 
> >>>> >a theoretically based piece of empirical research, but certainly not 
> >>>> >the first to offer such a substantive opinion.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >More than two decades ago, Imaddudin Abdulrahim, one of the 
> >>>> >country’s leading thinkers on Islamic monotheism, had often 
> >>>> >claimed that Ames, Iowa, was a microcosmic, or an exemplar, of an 
> >>>> >Islamic state. Of course, he understood well that this small Midwestern 
> >>>> >city was part of the United States, which is in no formal or informal 
> >>>> >sense regarded as being administered on the basis of Islamic sharia 
> >>>> >(law). 
> >>>> >
> >>>> >On one occasion, Mohammad Natsir, the former premier and leader of the 
> >>>> >Islamic party Masyumi, who became one of the principal advocates to the 
> >>>> >idea of Islam as the basis of state, considered the US a Christian 
> >>>> >nation â€" something that wasn’t that difficult to accept 
> >>>> >especially during the presidency of George 
> >>>> >W. Bush. This is notwithstanding the fact that many students of 
> >>>> >American society and politics tend to see the US as a secular 
> >>>> >(democratic) state, where it is often perceived that the affairs of the 
> >>>> >state and religion are separated. 
> >>>> >
> >>>> >But Imaddudin did not see Ames in the light of religious formality. 
> >>>> >Being a former student of Iowa State University for so many years, he 
> >>>> >knew well that no reference to Islam had ever been made in Ames’ 
> >>>> >day-to-day social, economic and political practices. Instead, 
> >>>> >recollecting my interview with him a long time ago when I was 
> >>>> >conducting my dissertation research, he weighed the day-to-day or 
> >>>> >regular practices of the people in Ames and regarded these as his 
> >>>> >parameters to judge this city as an Islamic abode. In doing so, he 
> >>>> >treated trust and justice as the two most important areas of reference.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Undoubtedly, he was so impressed by the fact that the people of Ames 
> >>>> >did not have to lock their houses when they were not at home, and yet 
> >>>> >no one in the community trespassed. Similarly, grocery workers would 
> >>>> >always be willing to exchange unsatisfactory goods or merchandise that 
> >>>> >was bought by customers â€" including broken eggs.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Trust and justice that had made the life in Ames so peaceful and secure 
> >>>> >was the key requirements he cited to call it Islamic. The realization 
> >>>> >of the principle of trust and justice in the people of Ames’ 
> >>>> >daily activities was for him a translation of Islamic sharia.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Imaddudin’s perception of Islamicity was comparable to that of 
> >>>> >Nurcholish Madjid, another prominent Muslim thinker. 
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Both the Muslim intellectuals saw Islam beyond sharia, and beyond its 
> >>>> >textual appearances. 
> >>>> >Given the universal values of 
> >>>> >Islam (or any religions for that matter), they emphasized more the 
> >>>> >substantive elements of Islam. This was the reason why Imaddudin and 
> >>>> >Nurcholish were of the opinion that as long as a state adheres to the 
> >>>> >principle of trust and justice, and practices the substantive values of 
> >>>> >Islamic teachings, it suffices for them to be regarded as Islamic. 
> >>>> >Under such circumstances, the formal adoption of Islam as a referent 
> >>>> >point is not terribly important. 
> >>>> >
> >>>> >In light of what has been presented, the study mentioned above saw 
> >>>> >religiosity or Islamicity more in a substantive than a formal or legal 
> >>>> >sense. Given the evaluation of the study, which puts many Islamic 
> >>>> >countries at lower ranks compared to their non-Muslim counterparts, it 
> >>>> >can be suggested that even in Muslim states, the day-to-day practices 
> >>>> >of their citizens do not always conform to or remain in accordance with 
> >>>> >Islamic teachings. 
> >>>> >
> >>>> >In the meantime, the day-to-day practice of non-Muslim countries does 
> >>>> >not necessarily contradict Islamic doctrines. In fact, as demonstrated 
> >>>> >by New Zealand, the day-to-day practices of its citizens can be viewed 
> >>>> >as Islamic.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Had Imaddudin and Nurcholish remained alive, they would have definitely 
> >>>> >shared this rejoinder.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >The writer is dean of the School of Social and Political Sciences at 
> >>>> >the State Islamic University in Jakarta.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> 
> >>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>
> >>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>




------------------------------------

Post message: prole...@egroups.com
Subscribe   :  proletar-subscr...@egroups.com
Unsubscribe :  proletar-unsubscr...@egroups.com
List owner  :  proletar-ow...@egroups.com
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    proletar-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    proletar-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    proletar-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Kirim email ke