Elo sendiri gak mampu bantah kalo elo puter lidah, doyan jadi pengecut Di dunia nyata elo cuman bisa jilatin pantat muslim demi sesuap nasi
-----Original Message----- From: item abu <item...@yahoo.com> Sender: proletar@yahoogroups.com Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 18:03:04 To: proletar@yahoogroups.com<proletar@yahoogroups.com> Reply-To: proletar@yahoogroups.com Subject: [proletar] Pertunjukan puter lidah Hehehe... ini tanya jawab antara Republican Daniel Lungren dgn Paul Stockton yg mewakili pemerintah Obama. Perhatikan cara puter lidah si Stockton, mengingatkan gua dgn cara puter lidah si Abbas Amin atau Teddy, ga mau ngejawab pertanyaan, tp terus ngeles, padahal pertanyaannya jelas sekali. Kenapa hrs pake puter lidah dan ngeles ke mana2? Krn para bangsat itu ga berani ngasih jawaban yg benar yg akan ngasih tunjuk kebejadan Islam. Ngutip dr http://battleland.blogs.time.com/2011/12/08/anti-islamic-hyperventilation/#ixzz1fz36J0aE REPRESENTATIVE DANIEL LUNGREN (R-CA): Secretary Stockton, are we at war with violent Islamist extremism? > > > MR. STOCKTON: No, sir. We are at war with al-Qaida, its affiliates – > > >REP. LUNGREN: OK, I understand that. My question is, is violent Islamist >extremism at war with us? > > > MR. STOCKTON: No, sir. We are being attacked by al-Qaida and its allies. > > > REP. LUNGREN: Is al-Qaida — can it be described as being an exponent of >violent Islamist extremism? > > > MR. STOCKTON: They — al-Qaida are murderers with an ideological agenda – > > > REP. LUNGREN: No, I — that’s not my question. That wasn’t my question. My >question was, is al-Qaida acting out violent Islamist extremism? > > > MR. STOCKTON: Al-Qaida is a violent organization dedicated to overthrowing >the values that we intend to advance – > > > REP. LUNGREN: So is it yes or no? > > > MR. STOCKTON: Can I hear the question again? I’ll make it as clear as I can. >We are not at war with Islam. And it is not – > > > REP. LUNGREN: I didn’t ask that — I did not ask that, sir. I asked whether we’re at war with violent Islamist extremism. That’s my question. > > > MR. STOCKTON: No, we’re at war with al-Qaida and its affiliates. > > > REP. LUNGREN: Well, al-Qaida — how does al-Qaida define itself? Are they >dedicated to violent Islamist extremism? > > >MR. STOCKTON: Al-Qaida would love to convince Muslims around the world that >the United States is at war with Islam. > > > REP. LUNGREN: I didn’t say that. > > > MR. STOCKTON: That’s a prime propaganda tool. > > > REP. LUNGREN: Sir – > > > MR. STOCKTON: And I’m not going to aid and abet that effort to advance their >propaganda goal. > > > REP. LUNGREN: No, no, my question is, is there a difference between Islam and >violent Islamist extremism? > > > MR. STOCKTON: Sir, with great respect, I don’t believe it’s helpful to frame our adversary as Islamic with any set of qualifiers that we might add, because we are not at war with Islam. > > > REP. LUNGREN: I understand that. I never said we were at war with Islam. One >of the questions we’re trying to deal with is the radicalization of Islam, is the radicalization of Islamic youth. And if we can’t distinguish between violent Islamist extremism and Islam, then all this stuff about behavioral indicators doesn’t mean anything. > > > Let me — let me ask you this question. Is it a behavioral indicator to put on >your card that you’re a soldier of Allah? > > > MR. STOCKTON: A behavioral indicator that you have a copy of Inspire magazine >on your desk – > > > REP. LUNGREN: That’s not my question. That’s not my question. My question is, is it a behavioral indicator to put on your card that you are a soldier of Allah, as Major Hasan did? > > > MR. STOCKTON: We have behavioral indicators now that enable our personnel, our supervisors, to focus on detecting indicators of violent extremism that reflect the lessons learned from Fort Hood. > > > REP. LUNGREN: OK, is that a lesson learned, that if you put a soldier of >Allah on your card, that you’ve got to follow up and investigate that? > > > MR. STOCKTON: We are training our supervisors to follow up on appropriate indicators and exercise the leadership they need in order to provide for effective reporting and intervention. > > >REP. LUNGREN: You agree with the statement, as someone representing the Department of Defense, on the weekend after the shooting, that it would be a greater tragedy to lose our program of diversity than what had occurred? > > > MR. STOCKTON: Well, let me go back to something Secretary — Chairman King said. I was trained up by Senator Moynihan. There was nobody less politically correct than Senator Moynihan. I follow the truth wherever it takes me, and I strongly support the programs of the Department of Defense that focus on al-Qaida and behavioral indicators. > > >REP. LUNGREN: I appreciate it. I appreciate it. > > >MR. STOCKTON: This is not about political correctness. This is about defeating >our adversary. > > > REP. LUNGREN: Well, sir, I would disagree with you that it may not be about political correctness. We are here talking about the fact that we now have to have behavioral indicators. I agree with that. But my question is, if someone gives inflammatory remarks, as did Major Hasan, in an open setting, if he has on his card that he was a soldier of Allah, it seems to me to be beyond common sense to think those are not behavioral indicators. > So my question is, if I’m a member of the military today and I see those two >events or those two circumstances, would it be appropriate for me to report those as behavioral indicators? Now, that’s not a question of whether or not you’re being political (sic) correct, sir. I’m asking you to answer that specific question. If I’m a soldier and asked you that question, what do you tell me? > > > MR. STOCKTON: Inflammatory rhetoric of the sort associated with Major Hasan — that needs to be reported, and our officers are trained up now to report on that behavior. > > > REP. LUNGREN: I thank you, and I appreciate that. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Post message: prole...@egroups.com Subscribe : proletar-subscr...@egroups.com Unsubscribe : proletar-unsubscr...@egroups.com List owner : proletar-ow...@egroups.com Homepage : http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: proletar-dig...@yahoogroups.com proletar-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: proletar-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/