I'm fine with the main org too. Then there's just the question of whether
we have one big compatibility repo for remote_write / PromQL / etc., or one
for each tested interface. There's definitely pros + cons for each
approach, but I'd ultimately be fine with either I think.

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 6:11 PM Tom Wilkie <tom.wil...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I only suggested the -community org so its not in my personal org, to
> encourage contributions from the wider community.  I would be happy to move
> it to the main prometheus org.
>
> As a monorepo guy, I'm less keen on a proliferation of many orgs so less
> keen on a dedicated prometheus-compatibility org...  but could be convinced.
>
> Cheers
>
> Tom
>
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 1:48 PM Richard Hartmann <
> richih.mailingl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 2:16 PM Julius Volz <julius.v...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Great! I think as we start taking compatibility more seriously, we
>> could even create a home for remote_write / PromQL / ... compatibility
>> tests in either the main Prometheus org, or in a dedicated "Prometheus
>> Compatibility Project" org?
>>
>> I strongly believe that the best place for tests we consider official
>> is the main Prometheus org, as long as the main author is fine with
>> moving them. I do not have strong opinions about the specific repo
>> they live in.
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prometheus Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to prometheus-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/CA%2BT6YoyHbL48Wu3RCJ2FYzJH%3DmnQq6ByUBL5MxTShXGiohKjgQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to