"statistic" inseamna ipotetic nu inseamna realitatea Nu vad de ce s-ar da presa cu capul de pereti ca unii sustinatori ai lui Kerry bat toba...
Sa fim seriosi, decat evreisme a la Kerry (no offense pentru evrei), mai bine Bush care macar stii la ce te astepti De ce nu se zice mai exact, asa cum s-a zis despre Bush, cine este Kerry si ce invarteli face?:) Eu am multi prieteni in SUA si statistic toti mi-au zis ca mai bine Bush decat Kerry, deci statistic a iesit cine trebuie ;) Cu MJ saracul asta e... Money sucks Gushterul Tuesday, February 1, 2005, 12:40:26 AM, you wrote: c> A aparut in fine si dovada ca escrocul de Bush a furat alegerile din c> 2004, dupa ce le-a furat si pe cele din 2000. c> Un grup de experti de prima mana americani au demonstrat in fine c> statistic cum ca diferenta de 5.5% dintre rezultatele exit poll-urilor c> si numaratorarea finala nu poate fi explicata decat prin frauda c> sistematica. Iar dobitocul ala de Kerry a acceptat cacialmaua cu ochii c> inchisi.... sa-i stea ketchup si botox-ul-n gat! c> Hai sa vedem acum cat de libera e presa americana: va prelua stirea c> asta beton si va investiga problema in mod serios, sau se va da la c> fund ca pana acum si va devia discuta spre toate tampeniile gen c> procesul lui M Jackson sau alte balarii.... c> http://www.uscountvotes.org/index.php?option=com_c c> ontent&task=view&id=72&Itemid=41 c> Prominent Statisticians Refute 'Explanation' of 2004 U.S. Exit Poll c> Discrepancies in New Edison/Mitofsky Report and Urge Investigation of c> U.S. Presidential Election Results. c> President Bush won November's election by 2.5% yet exit polls showed c> Kerry leading by 3%. Which was correct? c> "There are statistical indications that a systematic, nationwide shift c> of 5.5% of the vote may have occurred, and that we'll never get to the c> bottom of this, unless we gather the data we need for mathematical c> analysis and open, robust scientific debate.", says Bruce O'Dell, c> USCountVotes' Vice President. c> The study, "Response to Edison/Mitofsky Election System 2004 c> Report", c> was co-authored by a diverse group of professors and academicians c> specializing in statistics and mathematics. The USCountVotes team c> included Josh Mitteldorf, Ph.D., Temple University Statistics c> Department; Kathy Dopp, M.S. in mathematics, USCountVotes President; c> Steven F. Freeman, Ph.D., Visiting Scholar & Affiliated Faculty, c> Center for Organizational Dynamics, University of Pennsylvania; Brian c> Joiner, Ph.D., Professor of Statistics and Director of Statistical c> Consulting (ret), University of Wisconsin; Frank Stenger, Ph.D. c> Professor of Numerical Analysis, School of Computing, University of c> Utah; Richard G. Sheehan, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Finance, c> University of Notre Dame, Elizabeth Liddle, M.A. (UK) Ph.D. candidate c> at the University of Nottingham, Paul F. Velleman, Assoc. Professor, c> Ph.D., Department of Statistical Sciences, Cornell University; c> Victoria Lovegren, Ph.D., Lecturer, Department of Mathematics, Case c> Western Reserve University; Campbell B. Read, Ph.D. Professor c> Emeritus, Department of Statistical Science, Southern Methodist c> University. Their study does not support claims made by Edison Media c> Research and Mitofsky International that exit poll errors were to c> blame for the unprecedented 5.5% discrepancy between exit polls and c> official 2004 election results. c> According to this analysis by a group of senior statisticians, the new c> data just released by the exit-pollsters shows that the possibility c> that the overall vote count was substantially corrupted must be taken c> seriously. "Now we have statistical evidence that these reports c> were c> the tip of a national iceberg. The hypothesis that the discrepancy c> between the exit polls and election results is due to errors in the c> official election tally is a coherent theory that must be c> explored," c> said statistician Josh Mitteldorf. c> Their paper titled "Response to Edison/Mitofsky Election System 2004 c> Report" notes that the Edison/Mitofsky report offers no evidence to c> support their conclusion that Kerry voters "participated in the c> exit c> polls at a higher rate than Bush voters". In fact, the data c> provided c> in the Edison/Mitofsky report suggests that the opposite may have been c> true: Bush strongholds had slightly higher response rates than Kerry c> strongholds. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Give the gift of life to a sick child. Support St. Jude Children's Research Hospital's 'Thanks & Giving.' http://us.click.yahoo.com/lGEjbB/6WnJAA/E2hLAA/DXOolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Sageata Albastra e cea mai mare tzeapa a transportului public! Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protest-ro/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
