On 15/08/10 17:46, Tim Moore wrote:
Nice. I've been meaning to start using Boost.Parameter in one of my projects but I definitely like this syntax better. I'll probably start using this soon (like this week).

Please post if you make updates.

Thanks for the interest.It's still in its infancy and lack some of the features of boost::parameters. I'll prolly put up a boost git on my account and put it inside in a proper form.
_______________________________________________
proto mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/proto

Reply via email to