On 15 August 2010 18:30, Thomas Heller <[email protected]> wrote: >> Note that actually it doesn't handle passing parameters by ref ;). And >> that all the boost.parameter's features are not implemented! > > You can't expect everything from an afternoon of work ;) > Anyway, its purpose is just for having named parameters for function > arguments (yeah, ref is missing. if there is more interest, we will see what > can be done). >
I know, I was just pointing this out because it can be an issue for the users. It was not intended as a criticism of your great work ;). _______________________________________________ proto mailing list [email protected] http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/proto
