On Sunday 15 August 2010 18:16:07 Mathieu - wrote: > On 15 August 2010 17:46, Tim Moore <[email protected]> wrote: > > Nice. I've been meaning to start using Boost.Parameter in one of my > > projects but I definitely like this syntax better. I'll probably start > > using this soon (like this week). > > > > Please post if you make updates. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Tim > > Note that actually it doesn't handle passing parameters by ref ;). And > that all the boost.parameter's features are not implemented!
You can't expect everything from an afternoon of work ;) Anyway, its purpose is just for having named parameters for function arguments (yeah, ref is missing. if there is more interest, we will see what can be done). > However, this is really great and fast w/r to compile times! Haven't checked. But the only limit would be the size of fusion::map which is 10 by default, and should be enough! _______________________________________________ proto mailing list [email protected] http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/proto
