Thanks Rafi, for the link. I agree that any work should use this as a basis.
I plan to take a closer look at this in the next week or so. Rajith On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Rafael Schloming <r...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > A while back I implemented a relatively complete standalone codec here: > > > > https://github.com/rhs/qpid-proton-old/tree/codec/proton-j/src/main/java/org/apache/qpid/proton/codec2 > > It's quite a bit faster than the existing codec. I believe any new codec > work should probably be based on this. It's relatively standalone, so > should be easy to import into the tree, and then it's just a matter of > modifying the rest of the engine to use it. Note that my qpid-proton-old > repo is a clone of the pre-migration repo. > > --Rafael > > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Rajith Muditha Attapattu < > rajit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I'm starting to look at improving this areas as I was told a few folks > have > > noted some concerns. > > > > I would appreciate some input on these concerns and hope to have a > > discussion to figure out how best to proceed. > > > > Regards, > > > > Rajith > > >
