I don't believe there is an existing one. --Rafael
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Rajith Muditha Attapattu < rajit...@gmail.com> wrote: > Rafi, > > Do you have a JIRA for this work? > > Regards, > > Rajith > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Rajith Muditha Attapattu < > rajit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Rafi, > > > > I had a closer look at the code, put it on trunk and ran your benchmark. > > I see quite an improvement with respect to writing lists, maps and > strings. > > > > Simply put the writeList and writeMap methods in the old encorder is > about > > ~10 times slower than the new encorder. > > If I run with a sufficiently large set of strings, the old encorder is > > about ~2 times slower than the new encorder. > > > > I'm now focusing on hooking it up with the engine. > > > > Once that is done we can look at tweaking it further. But as it is, the > > new codec is a real improvement over the existing one. > > Great job Rafi! > > > > Rajith > > > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Rajith Muditha Attapattu < > > rajit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Thanks Rafi, for the link. > >> I agree that any work should use this as a basis. > >> > >> I plan to take a closer look at this in the next week or so. > >> > >> Rajith > >> > >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Rafael Schloming <r...@alum.mit.edu> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> A while back I implemented a relatively complete standalone codec here: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > https://github.com/rhs/qpid-proton-old/tree/codec/proton-j/src/main/java/org/apache/qpid/proton/codec2 > >>> > >>> It's quite a bit faster than the existing codec. I believe any new > codec > >>> work should probably be based on this. It's relatively standalone, so > >>> should be easy to import into the tree, and then it's just a matter of > >>> modifying the rest of the engine to use it. Note that my > qpid-proton-old > >>> repo is a clone of the pre-migration repo. > >>> > >>> --Rafael > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Rajith Muditha Attapattu < > >>> rajit...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > I'm starting to look at improving this areas as I was told a few > folks > >>> have > >>> > noted some concerns. > >>> > > >>> > I would appreciate some input on these concerns and hope to have a > >>> > discussion to figure out how best to proceed. > >>> > > >>> > Regards, > >>> > > >>> > Rajith > >>> > > >>> > >> > >> > > >
