Rafi, further to our discussion I have posted a patch to illustrate the approach we plan to take. This should enable me to make progress until you get a chance to make further changes on the Decoder side.
Regards, Rajith On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Rajith Muditha Attapattu < rajit...@gmail.com> wrote: > More questions. > > For all the maps we return should we restrict them to <String, Object> or > should it be <Object, Object> ? > Technically one could use a Number (int, long) etc as a key.. > > Any opinion here? ;) > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Rafael Schloming <r...@alum.mit.edu> > wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Rajith Muditha Attapattu < >> rajit...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Rafi could u pls answer the two questions I had in the code? >>> >>> 1. Your uint method only takes an int .. shouldn't it take a long? Bcos >>> it could contain a value larger than a java int? >>> >> >> To be honest I don't quite remember for sure, but I think it will do the >> two's complement and put it on the wire as a proper unsigned value. In >> other words I think it's just using the int type as a convenient/efficient >> way to pass around 4 bytes. >> >> >>> >>> 2. What should I use for boolean? there is no getBoolean .. or an >>> equivalent method >>> >> >> I think you might need to add this. I probably just omitted it. >> >> --Rafael >> > >
