On Thursday 15 October 2009 01:08:53 Andrew Dupont wrote: > Weighing in again, decades after starting the thread. > > First, I'm fine with calling it Function.IDENTITY instead of Function.K. > > On Sep 25, 2009, at 1:26 AM, T.J. Crowder wrote: > > Make sense. Shouldn't that be Function.empty and Function.k, though, > > to follow our naming rules? And perhaps Function.k should have a more > > meaningful name. > > I'm very much in favor of all-caps, or at least initial caps, to > indicate that these are constants.
Aren't most functions 'constants'? Eg, Array.empty isn't supposed to be reassigned but we don't write Array.EMPTY > We don't do this consistently in > the framework so far, but I'd like it to match stuff like > Event.KEY_ESC. I think the capitalization will also help distinguish > it from String#empty and Array#empty, as was mentioned elsewhere. > (Aside: I'm also in favor of renaming those methods to `isEmpty` for > 2.0.) > > What do people think about the capitalization? > > Cheers, > Andrew > > > -- Jim my wiki ajaxification thing: http://wikizzle.org my blog: http://jimhigson.blogspot.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-core-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
