Guys... (tapping shoulder)... um.... this is some pretty inconsequential
stuff that's being debated, wouldn't you say?
Just do Function.empty = Function.EMPTY = function() {};
(or just pick one)
Sorry, it really just doesn't matter vs. file size, modularity, performance,
features, (17 other facets I can't think of right now...).
---
Warm Regards,
Ryan Gahl
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:22 AM, T.J. Crowder <t...@crowdersoftware.com>wrote:
>
> Hey Andrew,
>
> Aren't all functions constants, in that sense? Function.EMPTY isn't
> more or less constant than Element.extend.
>
> -- T.J. ;-)
>
> On Oct 15, 1:08 am, Andrew Dupont <goo...@andrewdupont.net> wrote:
> > Weighing in again, decades after starting the thread.
> >
> > First, I'm fine with calling it Function.IDENTITY instead of Function.K.
> >
> > On Sep 25, 2009, at 1:26 AM, T.J. Crowder wrote:
> >
> > > Make sense. Shouldn't that be Function.empty and Function.k, though,
> > > to follow our naming rules? And perhaps Function.k should have a more
> > > meaningful name.
> >
> > I'm very much in favor of all-caps, or at least initial caps, to
> > indicate that these are constants. We don't do this consistently in
> > the framework so far, but I'd like it to match stuff like
> > Event.KEY_ESC. I think the capitalization will also help distinguish
> > it from String#empty and Array#empty, as was mentioned elsewhere.
> > (Aside: I'm also in favor of renaming those methods to `isEmpty` for
> > 2.0.)
> >
> > What do people think about the capitalization?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Andrew
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-core-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
